El proceso concursal extrajudicial previo en el Código de Quiebras de Estados Unidos (el 'Prepackaged Chapter Eleven' del U.S. Code)

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2018.27.2.3

Palabras clave:

derecho concursal estadounidense, reorganización empresarial, capítulo once del Código de Bancarrotas de Estados Unidos, procedimientos preventivos de la quiebra, Prepackaged Chapter Eleven

Resumen

Prior Out-of-Court Insolvency Proceedings under the Prepackaged Chapter Eleven of the United States Bankruptcy Code

O processo de falência extrajudicial prévio no Código de Falências dos Estados Unidos (o ‘Prepackaged Chapter Eleven’ do U.S. Code)

El presente trabajo estudia el Prepackaged Chapter Eleven (en adelante denominado PCE), proceso extrajudicial previo o alternativo al proceso del Chapter Eleven, el cual constituye una parte del sistema concursal de los Estados Unidos que abarca las soluciones preventivas de la quiebra en ese país, cuya finalidad es preservar y, virtualmente, salvar a la empresa de su desaparición económica y jurídica; este es conocido por el nombre de su respectivo capítulo, el Capítulo Once del Title Eleven del United States Bankruptcy Code, norma concursal federal que engloba numerosas materias en sus distintos capítulos. Los tópicos abordados en el trabajo son: el PCE en el contexto del derecho concursal estadounidense; las variables que justifican la elección entre el PCE y el tradicional proceso concursal del Chapter Eleven; las restantes vías extrajudiciales de reorganización empresarial; una descripción del PCE y su ámbito de aplicación; sus antecedentes históricos; la política legislativa de la reforma concursal de 1978; las posibilidades y ventajas de los procedimientos previos al Chapter Eleven; una comparación entre el proceso extrajudicial del PCE y el proceso judicial del Chapter Eleven; los casos en los que no es conveniente o pertinente el PCE; los tipos o variantes del PCE; técnicas para un PCE exitoso; los requisitos procesales para una solicitación de votos preconcursal; los riesgos que se corren en un PCE; algunos desarrollos recientes; los efectos de la reforma concursal de 2005, y la eficacia del PCE. En la parte conclusiva se realiza una valoración crítica de estas instituciones.

Para citar este artículo:

Héctor José Miguens, “El proceso concursal extrajudicial previo en el Código de Quiebras de Estados Unidos (el Prepackaged Chapter Eleven del U.S. Code)”, en Dikaion, 27, 2 (2018), pp. 231-281. DOI: 10.5294/dika.2018.27.2.3.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Hector Jose Miguens, Profesor Asociado, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires

Doctor en Derecho. Profesor Asociado de Derecho Concursal. Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Austral. Buenos Aires. Argentina

Citas

Alan B. Morrison (ed.), Fundamentals of American Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.

Clark, David S. y Turgrul Ansay (eds.), Introduction to the Law of the United States, The Hague, London, New York, Kluwer Law International, 2002.

AAVV, Harvard Law Review Association (ed.). The Bluebook. A uniform system of Citation, 19 ed., Cambridge, Mass., 2003.

AAVV, Symposium, Resolved: The 1978 Bankruptcy Code Has Been a Sucess (A Debate), 12 Am. Bankr. Inst L. Rev. 273, 276 (2004).

Weil, Gotshal y Manges, LLP, Reorganizing Failing Businesses. A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Financial Restructuring and Business Reorganization, rev. edition, American Bar Association, Chicago, 2006 (2 vols.).

Adler, Barry E., “Bankruptcy and Risk Allocation”, 77 Cornell L. Rev. 439 (1992).

Adler, Barry E., “Financial and political theories of American Corporate Bankruptcy”, 45 Stan. L. Rev. 311 (1993).

Adler, Barry Ed., “A world without debt”, 72 Wash. U. L. Q. 811 (1994).

Adler, Barry Ed., “Finance’s theoretical divide and the proper role of insolvency rules”, 68 S. Cal. L. Rev. 401 (1994).

Aghion, Philippe, Oliver Hart y John Moore, “The Economics of Bankruptcy Reform”, 8 J. L. Econ. & Org. 523 (1992).

Altman, Edward A. “Evaluating the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization Process”, 1 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. (1993).

American Ban kruptcy Ins titute, “Comission to Study the Reform of Chapter 11: 2012- 2014”. Final Report and Recommendations. https://abiworld.app.box.eom/s/wircv5xv83aavl4dp4h.

Arms, Abigail, Current Issues and Rulemaking Projects, en Conducting Due Diligence 1996, PLI Corp. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. B4-7131, 1996, pp. 747, 871.

Ayer, John D. et al., “Out-of-Court workouts, prepacks and pre-arranged cases: A primer”, 24 Am. Bankr. Inst. J. 16 (Apr. 2005).

Ayer, John D., “Bankruptcy as an essentially contested concept: The case of the one-asset case”, 44 S.C.L. Rev. 863 (1993).

Ayer, John D., “Chapter 11: Uses and Consequences”, 4 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 493 (1996).

Ayer, John D., “Through Chapter 11 with gun or camera, but probably not both: A field guide”, 72 Wash U.L.Q. 883 (1994).

Baird, Douglas G., Thomas H. Jackson, Barry E. Adler, Bankruptcy, Cases, Problems and Materials, 3 ed., New York, University Casebook Series, Rev. Foundation Press, 2001.

Baird, Douglas G. The Elements of Bankruptcy, 4 ed., New York, Foundation Press, 2006.

Baird, Douglas G., “Revisiting Auctions in Chapter 11”, 36 J. L. & Econ. 633 (1993).

Ball, Corinne y Reginald A. Greene, Strategies in “Prepackaged” Bankruptcies and Implications of Securities Laws, en Bankruptcy Law & Practice Update New Developments in an Uncertain Economy – A Satellite Program 2001, PLI Comm. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. A0-00DX, 2001.

Bankruptcy Code, Rules & Official Forms, Thomson West. Law School Edition, 2005.

Bebchuk, Lucian Ayre, “A New Approach to Corporate Reorganizations”, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 775 (1986).

Bhanda ri, Jagdeep S., Corporate Bankruptcy: Economic and Legal Perspectives, New York, 1996.

Blum, Brian A. Bankruptcy and Debtor / Creditor, Examples and Explanations, New York, Aspen Publishers, 2006.

Blumberg, Philip, Problems in the bankruptcy or reorganization of parent and subsidiary corporations, including the law of corporate guaranties, Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 1985 (supplement 2000).

Board of Judges for the Southern Dictrict of New York, General Order 201, 2nd February, 1999, as amended on February 24, 1999 by General Order 203.

Bowers, James W., “Groping and coping in the shadow of Murphy’s Law: Bankruptcy theory and the elementary economics of failure”, 88 Mich. L. Rev. 2097 (1990).

Bowers, James W., “Rehabilitation, redistribution, of dissipation: The evidence for choosing among bankruptcy hypotheses”, 72 Wash. U.L.Q. 955 (1994).

Bowers, James W., “The fantastic wisconsylvania zero-bureaucratic cost school of Bankruptcy theory: A comment”, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 1773 (1993).

Bradley, Michael & Michael Rosenzweig, “The untenable case for Chapter 11”, 101 Yale L.J. 1043 (1992).

Braucher, Jean, “Bankruptcy reorganization and economic development”, 23 Cap. U.L. Rev. 499 (1994).

Brubaker, Ralph, “One hundred years of federal bankruptcy law and still clinging to an in rem model of Bankruptcy jurisdiction”, 15 Bankr. Dev. J. 261 (1999).

Carlson, David Gray, “Bankruptcy theory and the creditors’ bargain”, 61 U. Cin. L. Rev. 453 (1992).

Case, Stephen H. y Mitchell A. Harwood, “Current issues in prepackaged Chapter 11 plans of reorganization and using the Federated Declaratory Judgment Act for Instant Reorganizations”, 191 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 75 (1992).

Cieri, Richard M. et al., “Safe harbor in uncharted waters – The securities law exceptions under Section 1125(e) of the Bankruptcy Code”, 51 Bus. Law. 379 (1996).

Crames, Michael J., Herbert S. Edelman y Andrew A. Kress, The Fundamentals of Bankruptcy and Corporate Reorganization, Juris Publishing, 1998. Easterbrook, Frank H., “Is Corporate Bankruptcy Efficient?”, 27 J. Fin. Econ. 411 (1990).

Edwards, Bryant B. y Robert A. Klyman, “Comment, prepackaged Bankruptcies: Alternative to traditional Chapter 11”, 6 Chapter 11 Update 1, 5 (May 1997).

Eisenberg, Theodore y Lynn Lopucki, “Shopping For Judges: An empirical analysis of venue choice in Chapter 11 reorganizations”, 84 Cornell L. Rev. 967 (1999).

Eisenberg, Theodore y Shoichi Tagashira, “Should we abolish Chapter 11? The evidence from Japan”, 23 J. Legal Stud. 111 (1994).

Eisenberg, Theodore y Stefan Sundgren, “Is Chapter 11 too favorable to debtors? Evidence from abroad”, 82 Cornell L. Rev. 1532 (1997).

Eisenberg, Theodore, “Bankruptcy Law in Perspective”, 28 UCLA L. Rev. 953 (1981).

Eisenberg, Theodore, “The unsecured creditor in reorganizations and the nature of security”, 38 Vand. L. Rev. 931 (1985).

Fenning, Lisa H., “The future of Chapter 11: One view from the bench”, 1993-1994 Ann. Surv. Bankr. L. 113.

Ferriell, Jeff y Edward J. Janger, Understanding Bankruptcy, 2 ed., New York, Lexis Nexis, 2007.

Frey, Martin A. Introduction to Bankruptcy Law, Thomson, Delmar Learning, 2007.

Frost, Christopher W., “Bankruptcy redistributive policies and the limits of the judicial process”, 74 N. C. L. Rev. 75 (1995).

Gilson, Stuart C. et al., “Troubled debt restructurings: An empirical study of private reorganization of firms in default”, 27 J. Fin. Econ. 315, 345 (1990).

Gross, Steven F. y George E. B. Maguire, Prepackaged Chapter 11 plans, in Chapter 11 Business Reorganizations 1994, PLI Comm. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. A4-4444, 1994.

Guzinski, Joseph A., Response: Small business reorganizations and the SABRE proposals, 7 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 295, 296 (2002).

Herbert, Michael J. Understanding Bankruptcy, New York, Lexis Nexis, Matthew Bender, 1995.

Hicks, Jonathan, Foxes guarding the henhouse: The modern best interests of creditors test in Chapter 11 reorganizations, 5 Nev. L. J. 820, 826 (2005).

Howard, Margaret, Bankruptcy, Cases and Materials, St. Paul, Minn., American Casebook Series, Thomson, West Publishing, 2004.

Jackson, Thomas H. The logic and limits of bankruptcy law, Harvard University Press, Boston, 1986.

Jackson, Thomas H., “Bankruptcy, nonbankruptcy entitlements and the creditors’ bargain”, 91 Yale L. J. 857 (1982).

Johnston, J. Bradley, “The Bankruptcy Bargain”, 65 Am. Bankr. L. J. 213 (1991).

Jones, Edith A., “Chapter 11: A death penalty for debtor and creditor interests”, 77 Cornell L. Rev. 1088 (1992).

Keating , Daniel, “Offensive uses of the Bankruptcy stay”, 45 Vand. L. Rev. 71 (1991).

Klee, Kenneth N., “Adjusting Chapter 11: Fine tuning the plan process”, 69 Am. Bankr. L. J. 551 (1995).

Korobkin , Donald R., “Contractarianism and the normative foundations of Bankruptcy law”, 71 Tex. L. Rev. 541 (1993).

Korobkin, Donald R., “Rehabilitating values: A jurisprudence of Bankruptcy”, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 717 (1991).

Korobkin, Donald R., “The unwarranted case against corporate reorganization: A Reply to professors Bradley and Rosenzweig”, 78 Iowa L. Rev. 669 (1993).

Kruger, Lewis, Understanding the Basics of Business Bankruptcy and Reorganization 2008, New York, Practicing Law Institute, 2000.

Levin, Ezra G. et al., The aquisition of troubled companies, en Corporate Mergers and Acqisitions, ALI-ABA Continuing Legal Education núm. C115, 1995.

Lopucki, Lynn M. y Sara D. Kalin, The failure of public company Bankruptcies in Delaware and New York: Empirical evidence of a “Race to the Bottom”, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 231 (2001).

Lopucki, Lynn M. y William C. Whitford, “Patterns in the Bankruptcy reorganization of large, publicly held companies”, 78 Cornell L. Rev. 597, 610-11 (1993).

Lopucki, Lynn M., “Bankruptcy contracting revised: A reply to Alan Schwartz’s new model”, 109 Yale L. J. 365 (1999).

Lopucki, Lynn M., “Chapter 11: An Agenda for Basic Reform”, 69 Am. Bankr. L. J. 573 (1995).

Lopucki, Lynn M., “Contract Bankruptcy: A reply to Alan Schwartz”, 109 Yale L. J. 317 (1999).

Lopucki, Lynn M., “The trouble with Chapter 11”, 1993 Wis. L. Rev. 729.

Lopucki, Lynn, “Strange visions in a strange world: A reply to professors Bradley and Rosenzweig”, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 79 (1992).

Macdonald, Mark E. et al., “Chapter 11 as a dynamic evolutionary learning process in a market with fuzzy values”, 1993-1994 Ann. Surv. Bankr. L. 1.

Mayerson, Sandra E., “Current developments in prepackaged Bankruptcy plans, prepackaged Chapter 11 plans”, en 24th Annual Current Developments in Bankruptcy & Reorganization, PLI Comm. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. A0-00E6, 2002.

McHugh, Christopher M. y Thomas A. Sawyer (eds.), The 2004 Bankruptcy Yearbook & Almanac, 2004.

McConnel, John J. et al., “Prepacks as a mechanism for resolving financial distress: The evidence”, 8 J. App. Corp. Fin 101 (Winter 1996).

Miller, Harvey R. y Shai Y. Waisman, “Does Chapter 11 Reorganization remain a viable option for distressed businesses for the twenty-first century?”, 78 Am. Bankr. L. J. 153, 186-87 (2004).

Moloney, Thomas J. y Shari Siegel, “Legal issues and alternatives for creditors of troubled companies”, en The Problems of Indenture Trustees and Bondholders, PLI Real Estate L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. N4-4591, 1995.

Pasquale, Kenneth, “Combustion engineering: Setting limits on pre-packaged asbestos bankrupcies. A flawed solution”, 44 S. Tex. L. Rev. 883, 907 (2003).

Pohl, Thimothy R. et al., “Out of court restructuring and prepackaged plans”, en Dealing with Secured Claims & Structured Financial Products in Bankruptcy Cases, PLI Comm. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. A0-00HP, 2003.

Ponoroff, Lawrence, “Enlarging the bargaining table: Some implications of the corporate stakeholder model for federal Bankruptcy proceedings”, 23 Cap. U.L. Rev. 441 (1994).

Raborn, Glenda M., Setting the standards for appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee under §1104(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code: Can a debtor cooperative remain in possession?, 18 Miss. C. L. Rev. 509, 512, 526 (1998).

Rasmussen, Robert K. y David A. Skell, Jr., “The economic analysis of corporate Bankruptcy Law”, 3 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 85 (1995).

Rasmussen, Robert K. “The efficiency of Chapter 11”, 8 Bankr. Dev. J. 319 (1991).

Rasmussen, Robert K., “Debtor’s choice: A menu approach to Corporate Bankruptcy”, 71 Tex. L. Rev. 51 (1992).

Rasmussen, Robert K., “The ex ante effects of Bankruptcy reform on investment incentives”, 72 Wash U.L.Q. 1159 (1994).

Resnick, Alan N. Bankruptcy Law Manual, 5 ed., Thomson, West, 2002.

Roe, Mark J. Bankruptcy and Corporate Reorganization, Legal and Financial Materials, New York, Foundation Press, 2007.

Roe, Mark J., “Bankruptcy and debt: A new model for corporate reorganizations”, 83 Colum. L. Rev. 527 (1983).

Rosen, Leonard M. y Susan M. Treyz, Plan acceptance and disclosure statement: SEC interplay. Plan confirmation: Developments during 1991, en Current Developments in Bankruptcy and Reorganization 1992, PLI Comm. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. A4-4377, 1992.

Rusch, Linda J. “Bankruptcy reorganization jurisprudence: Matters of belief, faith and hope – Stepping into the fourth dimension”, 55 Mont. L. Rev. 9 (1994).

Saggese, Nicholas P. y Alesia Ranney-Marinelli (eds.), A Practical Guide to Out-of- Court Restructurings and Prepakaged Plans of Reorganization, § 403(B)(2), 2 ed. Supp. 1998.

Scarberry, Mark S., Kenneth N. Klee, Grant W. Newton y Steve H. Nickes, Business Reorganization in Bankruptcy, Cases and Materials, 3 ed., Thomson, West Publishing, 2006.

Schwarcz, Steven L., “Rethinking freedom of contract: A Bankruptcy paradigm”, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 515 (1999).

Schwartz, Alan, “Bankruptcy Workouts and Debt Contracts”, 36 J. L. & Econ. 595 (1993).

Schwartz, Alan, “Contracting about Bankruptcy”, 13 J. L. & Econ. 595 (1993).

Securities and Exchange Commission, Report on the Study and Investigation of the Work, Activities, Personnel and Functions of Protective and Reorganization Committees, 1940.

Sherman, Stephen E., Overview of Bankruptcy from the indenture trustee’s perspective, in The Problems of Indenture Trustees and Bondholders 1994: Defaulted Bonds, High Yield Issus and Bankruptcy, PLI Comm. L. & Prac. Course Handbook Series, núm. N4-4582, 1994.

Skeel, David A. Jr., “Markets, courts and the brave new world of Bankruptcy theory”, 1993 Wis. L. Rev. 465.

Skeel, David A. Jr., “Rethinking the line between corporate law and corporate Bankruptcy”, 72 Tex. L. Rev. 471 (1994).

Smyser, Kathryn, “Going private and going under: Leveraged buyouts and the fraudulent conveyance problem”, 63 Ind. L. J. 781 (1988).

Spiotto, Ann H., The ultimate downside of outsourcing: Bankruptcy of the service provider, 11 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 47, 61 (2003).

Sullivan , Teresa, Elisabeth Warren y Jay L. Westbrook, As we Forgive our Debtors: Bankruptcy and Consumer Credit in America, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989 (hay edición de 1991). Tabb, Charles J. y Ralph Brubaker, Bankruptcy Law: Principles, Policies and Practice, 2 ed., New York, Lexis Nexis, 2006.

Tabb, Charles J., “The future of Chapter 11”, 44 S. C. L. Rev. 791, 804 (1993).

TABB, Charles J. Bankruptcy Anthology, Cincinnati, Anderson Publishing Co., 2002.

Tabb, Charles Jordan, “The history of the Bankruptcy laws in the United States”, 3 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 5, 21-23 (1995).

Tabb, Charles Jordan, The Law of Bankruptcy, Westbury, The Foundation Press, New York, 1997.

Trieber, Jacob, The abuses of receiverships, 19 Yale L. J. 275, 276-77 (1910).

Wagner, Karen E., “Representing a business debtor”, in Understanding Business Bankruptcy How to handle Everyday Problems – A Satellite Program, PLI Commercial Law and Practice Course Handbook Series, núm. A4-4393, 1992.

Warren, Elisabeth y Jay Lawrence Westbrook, The Law of Debtors and Creditors, Text, Cases and Problems, 6th Ed., Austin, Boston, Chicago, New York, The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 2009.

Warren, Elisabeth, “Bankruptcy policy”, 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 775 (1987).

Warren, Elisabeth, “Bankruptcy policymaking in an imperfect world”, 92 Mich. L. Rev. 336 (1993).

Warren, Elisabeth, “The untenable case for the repeal of Chapter 11”, 102 Yale L.J. 437 (1992).

Warren, Elizabeth, Chapter 11: Reorganizing American Businesses, Austin, Boston, Chicago, New York, The Netherlands, Aspen Publishers, Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 2008.

Warren, William D. y Daniel J. Bussel, Bankruptcy, 4 ed., New York, University Casebook Series, Foundation Press, 2002.

Weil, Gotshal y Manges, LLP, Reorganizing failing businesses. A comprehensive review and analysis of financial restructuring and business reorganization, rev. edition, Chicago, American Bar Association, 2006, 2 vols.

Weiss, Lawrence A., “Bankruptcy resolution: Direct costs and violation of priority of claims”, 27 J. Fin. Econ. 285 (1990).

White, Michelle J., “Corporate Bankruptcy as a filtering device: Chapter 11 Reorganizations and out-of-court debt restructurings”, 10 J. L. Econ. & Org. 268 (1994).

White, Michelle J., “Does Chapter 11 save economically inefficient firms?” 72 Wash. U.L.Q. 1319 (1994).

Whitford, William C., “What’s Right About Chapter 11”, 72 Wash. U.L.Q. 1379 (1994).

Jurisprudencia:

Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Clerk, U.S. Bankr. Court, New York, NY (In re Chateaguay Corp.), 89 F. 3d 942 (2d cir. 1996).

Fighter Ltd v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass’n of America (In re Fighter Ltd.) 118 F. 3d 635 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 996 (1997).

Hanson v. First State Bank, 828 F. 2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1987).

In re 203 N. LaSalle St., L.P., 190 B.R. 567, 585-86 (Bankr. N.D. Ili. 1995).

In re ACandS, Inc. 311 B.R. 36 (Bankr. D. Del. 2004).

In re Aerovias Nacionales, 303 B.R. 1, 10 n. 11 (2003).

In re Allegheny International, Inc., 118 Ba. R. 282 (Bankr. W. D. Pa. 1990).

In re Anglo Energy, Inc., núm. 88-B-10360 (BLR) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1988).

In re Aztec Co., 107 B.R. 585, 590 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1989).

In re Bellvue Place Associates 171 B.R. 615 (Bankr. N. D. Ill. 1994).

In re Choice Communications Inc., núm. 04-16433 (RDD) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2004).

In re Circle Express, Inc., núm. 90-07980 (RLB) (Bankr. D. Ind. 1990).

In re Colonial Ford, Inc., 24 B.R. 1014, 1015-16 (Bankr. D. Utah 1982).

In re Combustion Eng’g, Inc., 391 F. 3d 190, 235-38 (3d Cir. 2004).

In re Combustion Eng’g, Inc., núm. 03-10495 (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 17, 2003).

In re Crystal Oil Co., núm. 586-02834 (Bankr. W.D. L. 1986).

In re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 696, 702 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999).

In re Dow Corning Corp., 280 F. 3d 648, 662 (6th Cir. 2002).

In re E-II Holdings Inc., núm. 92-B-43614 (CB) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Juen 25, 1992).

In re Exide Techs., 303 B.R. 48, 78 (Bankr. D. Del. 2003).

In re Featherworks Corp., 25 B.R. 634 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1982).

In re Ferretti, 128 B.R. 16, 18-19 (Bankr. D.N.H. 1991).

In re FF Holdings Corporation, Case núm. 98-37 (Bankr. Del. January 7, 1998) (Farnin C.J.).

In re Flagstar Corp., núm. 97-05104 (Bankr. D.S.C. June 17, 1997).

In re Fuller-Austin Insulation Co., núm. 98-2038 (JJF)(Bankr. De. Del. Sept. 4, 1998).

In re Hoffinger Indus., 292 B.R. 639, 643-44 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2003).

In re IWO Holdings, Inc., núm. 05-100009 (PJW) (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 9, 2005).

In re J.T. Thorpe Co., núm. 02-41487-H5-11 (Bankr. S. D. Tex. Oct 1, 2002).

In re Jersey Med. Ctr., 817 F. 2d 1055 (3d Cir. 1987).

In re JPS Textile Group, Inc., 91-B-10546 (JAG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1991).

In re Kellogg Square Partnership, 160 B.R. 336 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1993).

In re La Salle Energy Corp., núm. 90-05508-H3-11 (LC) (Bankr. S.D. Tex 1990).

In re LaFayette Hotel P’ship, 227 B.R. 445, 449 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).

In re Lernout & Hauspie Speech Prods., N.V. 301 B.R. 651, 661 (Bankr. D. Del. 2003).

In re Magellan Health Serv., Inc., núm. 03-40515 (PCB), (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct 8, 2003).

In re Marvel Entm’t Group, Inc., núms. 96-2069-2077 (HSB)(Bankr. D. Del. 1996).

In re MB Holdings, Inc., núm. 91-B-15617 (BRL) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1992).

In re Mc.Lean Indus., 87 B.R. 830, 835 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987).

In re Memorex Telex N.V. & Memorex Telex Corp., núm. 92-8 (Bankr. D. Del. 1992).

In re Nat’l/Northway L.P., 279 B.R. 17 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2002).

In re New Valley Corp., 168 B.R. 73, 74-75 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1994).

In re NII Holdings Inc., núm. 02-11505 (MFW)(Bankr. D. De. Oct. 25, 2002).

In re Pioneer Finance Corp., 246 B.R. 626, 635 (Bankr D. Nev. 2000).

In re PSF Fin. L.P. / Premium Standard Farms, Inc., núms. 96-1032-1036 (HSB) (Bankr. D. Del. 1996).

In re Ravenna Indus., 20 B.R. 886, 890 (Bankr. Ohio 1982).

In re Richard Buick, Inc., 126 B.R. 840, (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1991).

In re Scioto Valley Mortgage Co., 88 B.R. 168, 170-71 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1988).

In re Scott Cable Communications, Inc., 227 B.R. 596 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1998).

In re Shook & Fletch Insulation Co., núm. 02-02771-BGC-11 (Bankr. N. D. Ala. April 8, 2002).

In re Southland Corp., 124 B. R. 211, 227 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1991).

In re Stations Holding Co., núm. 02-10882 (MFW)(Bankr. D. De. Sept. 30, 2002).

In re Stoneridge Apartments, 125 B.R. 794, 796 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1991).

In re Sunshine Precious Metals, Inc. 142 B.R. 918 (Bankr. D. Idaho 1992).

In re Syratech Corp., núm. 05-11062 (RS)(Bankr. D. Mass. 2005).

In re Texasoil Enters., 296 B.R. 431, 435 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2003).

In re THCR/LP Corp., núm. 04-46898 (D.N.J. 2004).

In re Valrico Square Ltd. P’ship, 113 B.R. 794, 795 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1990).

In re Zenith Elecs. Corp., 241 B.R. 92 (Bankr. D. Del. 1999)

In re Zenith Electronics Corp., 241 B.R. 92, 103-05 (Bankr. D. Del. 1999).

LTV Corp. V. Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. (In re Chateauguay Corp.), 961 F. 2d 378, 382 (2d Cir. 1992).

Marcus Montgomery Wolfson & Burten P.C. v. AM International, Inc. (In re AM International, Inc.,) 203 B.R. 898 (D. Del. 1996).

Pioneer Fin. Corp. (In re Pioneer Fin. Corp., núm. BK-S-99-11404 LBR (Bankr. D. Nev. 1999).

Transworld Airlines, Inc. V. Texaco Inc. (In re Texaco Inc.), 81 B.R. 813 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1988).

Vista Del Mar Associates, Inc. v. West Coast Land Fund (In re Vista Del Mar Associates, Inc.) 181 B. R. 422 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1995).

Zenith Electronics Corp., 241 B.R. 92 (Bankr. D. Del. 1999).

Descargas

Publicado

2018-10-26

Cómo citar

Miguens, H. J. (2018). El proceso concursal extrajudicial previo en el Código de Quiebras de Estados Unidos (el ’Prepackaged Chapter Eleven’ del U.S. Code). Díkaion, 27(2), 231–281. https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2018.27.2.3

Número

Sección

Artículos