Theoretical Foundations and Techniques for Conducting International Law Research from Critical Approaches

Héctor Olasolo; Mario Iván Urueña-Sánchez; Walter Arévalo-Ramírez

doi:10.5294/dika.2023.32.1.16

Autores/as

Héctor Olasolo Autor/a Universidad del Rosario https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-0163
Mario Iván Urueña-Sánchez Autor/a Universidad del Rosario https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-0163
Walter Arévalo-Ramírez Autor/a Universidad del Rosario https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-5513

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2023.32.1.16

Palabras clave:

Teorías críticas, derecho internacional, fundamentos teóricos, métodos de investigación, técnicas de investigación

Resumen

El objetivo de este artículo será el de construir un estado del arte respecto de los fundamentos teóricos y las opciones metodológicas de las que puede hacer uso un investigador interesado en trabajar con perspectivas críticas del derecho internacional. Con las cuatro perspectivas escogidas para este ejercicio (TWAIL, CILS, teorías feministas e idealismo social), se hará una disección sobre sus fundamentos teóricos y los métodos y técnicas de investigación pertinentes. También, vale la pena establecer el encuadramiento de las investigaciones críticas en derecho internacional en la monodisciplinariedad, la multidisciplinariedad y la interdisciplinariedad dependiendo de la interacción entre conceptos y métodos jurídico-internacionales.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ABELLO-GALVIS, Ricardo, and Walter AREVALO-RAMIREZ. “Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17: Jurisdictional, Procedural and Substantive Implications of Human Rights Duties in the Context of Environmental Protection.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 28, no. 2 (2019): 217–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12290

ALLOTT, Phillip. “The Concept of International Law.” European Journal of International Law 10, no. 1 (1999): 31–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.1.31

ALLOTT, Philip. “Reconstituting Humanity — New International Law.” European Journal of International Law 3, no. 2 (1992): 219–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/3.2.219

ARMSTRONG, J. D., Theo FARRELL, and Hélène LAMBERT. International Law and International Relations. 2nd ed. Themes in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894565

BIANCHI, Andrea. International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking. First edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725114.001.0001

BORDENS, Kenneth S., and Bruce B. ABBOTT. Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach with PowerWeb. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2003.

CAMPDERRICH BRAVO, Ramón. “¿Derecho internacional o guerra imperial? Hans Kelsen y Carl Schmitt ante la pacificación de las relaciones interestatales por medio del derecho.” Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 43 (2009): 19–38.

CARTY, Anthony. “Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law.” European Journal of International Law 2, no. 1 (1991): 66–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/2.1.66

CARTY, Anthony. “Myths of International Legal Order: Past and Present.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 10, no. 2 (1997): 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557579708400132

CARTY, Anthony. “New Philosophical Foundations for International Law: From an Order of Fear to One of Respect.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19, no. 2 (2006): 311–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570600724785

CHARLESWORTH, Hilary. “Feminist Methods in International Law.” Studies in Transnational Legal Policy 36 (2004): 159 en https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stdtlp36&id=171&div=&collection=

CHIMNI, B. S. “Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto.” International Community Law Review 8, no. 1 (2006): 3–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187197306779173220

CHINEDU OKAFOR, Obiora. “Critical Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL): Theory, Methodology, or Both?” International Community Law Review 10, no. 4 (2008): 371–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187197308X366614

CORTEN, Olivier. Méthodologie du droit international public. Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles, 2009.

COX, Robert W, and Timothy J SINCLAIR. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607905

FOUCAULT, Michel. Microfísica Del Poder. Edited by Julia Varela. Translated by Fernando Álvarez-Uría. 2nd ed. Madrid: La Piqueta, 1980.

GOLDMAN, Harvey. “From Social Theory to Sociology of Knowledge and Back: Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Intellectual Knowledge Production.” Sociological Theory 12, no. 3 (1994): 266–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202125

HARRISON, Lisa. Political Research: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2001.

HART, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press, 1994.

HERMANN, Margaret G. “Content Analysis.” In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, edited by Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash, 151–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008.

HOLTERMANN, Jakob V. H., and Mikael RASK MADSEN. “European New Legal Realism and International Law: How to Make International Law Intelligible.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28, no. 2 (2015): 211–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000047

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA (ICTY). “Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic (Appeal Judgement) IT-94-1-A,” July 15, 1999, en https://www.refworld.org/cases,ICTY,40277f504.html

KELSEN, Hans, and Roberto J. VERNENGO. Teoría pura del derecho. 2nd ed. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1982 en http://ru.juridicas.unam.mx:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/10001

KLINK, Bart van, and Sanne TAEKEMA, eds. Law and Method: Interdisciplinary Research into Law. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.

KLOTZ, Audie, and Cecelia Lynch. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. International Relations in a Constructed World. New York: Routledge, 2007.

KLOTZ, Audie, and Deepa Prakash, eds. Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129

KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. “International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17, no. 2 (2004): 197–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000245852

KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. “The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics.” The Modern Law Review 70, no. 1 (2007): 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00624.x

MACLEOD, Alexandre, and Dan O’MEARA, eds. “Le constructivisme.” In Théories des relations internationales: contestations et résistances, 244–68. Montréal: Athéna éd, 2007.

MARTÍNEZ RODRÍGUEZ, Jorge. “Métodos De Investigación Cualitativa.” Silogismo 8, no. 1 (2011): 27–38.

MCCOURT, David M. “The ‘Problem of Generations’ Revisited: Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Knowledge in International Relations.” In Theory and Application of the “Generation” in International Relations and Politics, edited by Brent J. Steele and Jonathan M. Acuff, 47–70. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011565_3

MCDORMAN, Ted L. “The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: A Technical Body in a Political World.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 17, no. 3 (2002): 301–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157180802X00099

MOHANTY, Chandra. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Feminist Review 30, no. 1 (1988): 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1988.42l

MOLINA ORTIZ, José Antonio, Asunción García González, Azucena Pedraz Marcos, and María Victoria Antón Nardiz. “Aprendizaje basado en problemas: una alternativa al método tradicional.” Revista de la RED-U 3, no. 2 (2003): 79–85 en https://redined.educacion.gob.es/xmlui/handle/11162/91288

MÜLLER-BÖLING, Detlef, and Heinz KLANDT. Methoden empirischer Wirtschafts- und Sozialforschung: eine Einführung mit wirtschaftswissenschaftlichem Schwerpunkt. 3rd ed. Köln Dortmund: Universität Dortmund, 1996.

MUTUA, Makau. “What Is TWAIL?” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 94 (2000): 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700054896

OLÁSOLO-ALONSO, Héctor OLÁSOLO, Mario Iván URUEÑA-SÁNCHEZ, and Andrés SÁNCHEZ SARMIENTO. “Marco analítico y metodológico.” In La función de la corte penal internacional: Visiones plurales desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar: Volumen Especial por el X Aniversario del Instituto Ibero-Americano de la Haya para la Paz, los Derechos Humanos y la Justicia Internacional. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2021 en https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=833736

QUIRK, Joel. “Historical Methods.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0030

RASULOV, Akbar. “CLS and Marxism: A History of an Affair.” Transnational Legal Theory 5, no. 4 (2014): 622–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/20414005.5.4.622

ROJO, Luisa Martín. “El análisis crítico del discurso: fronteras y exclusión social en los discursos racistas.” In Análisis del discurso: manual para las ciencias sociales, 2nd ed., 161–96. Sociología 74. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, 2006.

ROMANO, Cesare, Karen J. ALTER, and Yuval SHANY, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.001.0001

SARMIENTO LAMUS, Andres, and Walter ARÉVALO RAMÍREZ. “Non-Appearance before the International Court of Justice and the Role and Function of Judges Ad Hoc.” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16, no. 3 (2017): 398–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341358

SCOBBIE, Iain. “Slouching towards the Holy City: Some Weeds for Philip Allott.” European Journal of International Law 16, no. 2 (2005): 299–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi118

SCOBBIE, Iain. “‘The Holiness of the Heart’s Affection’: Philip Allott’s Theory of Social Idealism.” In Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law, by Alexander Orakhelashvili, 13449. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933089.00014

SHAW, Malcolm N. International Law. 6th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

SIL, Rudra. “Simplifying Pragmatism: From Social Theory to Problem-Driven Eclecticism.” International Studies Review 11, no. 3 (2009): 648–52.

STOCKER, Barry. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Derrida on Deconstruction. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358115

THIRLWAY, H. W. A. The Sources of International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

TICKNER, J. Ann. “What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions.” International Studies Quarterly 49, no. 1 (2005): 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x

URUEÑA-SÁNCHEZ, Mario. Mercenarios y compañías militares y de seguridad privadas: estructuración de sus redes normativas. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020 en https://editorial.tirant.com/es/libro/mercenarios-y-companias-militares-y-de-seguridad-privadas-estructuracion-de-sus-redes-normativas-mario-uruena-sanchez-9788413368979

URUEÑA-SÁNCHEZ, Mario Iván. “El positivismo de Kelsen y Hart en el derecho internacional contemporáneo: una mirada crítica.” International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 15, no. 31 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.il15-31.pkhd

VAN DIJK, Teun A. “Ideología y análisis del discurso.” Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, no. 29 (2005): 9–36 en https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2734720

ZIMMERMANN, Andreas, Christian J. TAMS, Karin OELLERS-FRAHM, Christian TOMUSCHAT, Felix BOOS, and Eleni METHYMAKI, eds. The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary. 3rd ed. Oxford Commentaries on International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.