Fundamentos bíblicos de la separación de poderes y función catalizadora del juez
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2019.28.2.1Palabras clave:
División de poderes, constitucionalismo, supremacía judicial, función judicial, fundamentos cristianos de la separación de poderes.Resumen
Biblical Foundations for the Separation of Powers and the Catalysing Function of Judges
Fundamentos bíblicos da separação de poderes e a função catalisadora do juiz
Este artículo sostiene que la Biblia fundamenta el principio de separación de poderes. En efecto, a partir de una reconstrucción conceptual de dicha noción, este trabajo defiende la tesis de que las Escrituras atribuyen a los jueces la función de incentivar a las autoridades políticas a comportarse de forma virtuosa para proteger los derechos e intereses de las personas. Las conclusiones que proporciona este artículo resultan de suma relevancia para sostener una concepción que incentive a los jueces a ejercer una función catalizadora para que las autoridades políticas efectivamente protejan los derechos e intereses de las personas mediante la creación de derecho y la formulación de políticas públicas.
Para citar este artículo / To reference this article / Para citar este artigo
Carlos Bernal-Pulido, “Fundamentos bíblicos de la separación de poderes y función catalizadora del juez”, en Dikaion 28, 2 (2019), 222-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2019.28.2.1
Recibido: 17/07/2019
Aceptado: 15/08/2019
Publicado: 24/10/2019
Descargas
Citas
Albert, Richard, “Amendment and revision in the unmaking of constitutions”, en David Landau y Hanna Lerner (eds.), Handbook on Comparative Constitution-Making, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar (en prensa), en https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2841110, fecha de consulta: 12 de marzo de 2018.
Albert, Richard, “Constitutional amendment and dismemberment”, Yale Journal of International Law 43 (2018), en https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1685&context=yjil
Albert, Richard, “Constitutional amendment by constitutional desuetude”, American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (2014), p. 641, en https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1757&context=lsfp
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Arato, Julián, “Treaty interpretation and constitutional transformation: Informal change in international organizations”, Yale Journal of International Law 38 (2013), p. 304, en https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2142083
Aristóteles, Política, Libro IV, Capítulo 14, en http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.4.four.html, fecha de consulta: 2 de agosto de 2019.
Barak, Aharon, “Unconstitutional constitutional amendments”, Israeli Law Review 44 (2011), pp. 321-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700018082
Bernal, Carlos, “Informal constitutional change”, American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (2014), p. 495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2014.0017
Bernal, Carlos, “Unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the case study of Colombia: An analysis of the justification and meaning of the constitutional replacement doctrine”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2) (2013), pp. 339-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot007
Bilchitz, David y David Landau, “Introduction: The evolution of the separation of powers in the Global South and Global North”, en David Bilchitz y David Landau (eds.), The Evolution of the Separation of Powers. Between the Global North and the Global South, Cheltenham, Elgar, 2018.
Bilchitz, David, Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.
Crisafulli, Vezio, “Disposizione (e norma)”, XIII Enciclopedia del Diritto 165 y 203 (1964).
Dixon, Rosalind y David Landau, “Constraining constitutional change”, Wake Forest Law Review 50 (2015), pp. 859-890, en https://ssrn.com/abstract=2624842
Ferraz, Octavio, “Health inequalities, rights and courts: The social impact of the ‘judicialization of health’ in Brazil”, en Alicia E. Yamin y Siri Gloppen (eds.), Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health?, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 2011.
Garoupa, Nuno, “Comparing Judicial Activism – Can we Say that the US Supreme Court is more Activist than the German Constitutional Court”, Revista portuguesa de filosofía 72 (4) (2016), pp. 1089-1105, en https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887650
Jung, Courtney, Ran Hirschl y Evan Rosevear, “Economic and social rights in national constitutions”, American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (4) (2014), en https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2349680
Khosla, Madhav, “Constitutional amendment”, en Sujit Choudhry, Madhav Khosla y Pratap Bhanu Mehta, The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.
Kramer, Larry, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Landau, David, “Abusive constitutionalism”, University of California Davis Law Review 47 (2013), pp. 189-200, en https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/47/1/articles/47-1_Landau.pdf
Landau, David, “The importance of constitution-making”, Denver University Law Review 89 (3) (2011-2012), pp. 611-633, en https://ssrn.com/abstract=1950405
Landau, David, “The reality of social rights enforcement”, Harvard International Law Journal 53 (1) (2012), en https://harvardilj.org/2012/01/issue_53-1_landau/
Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, en P. Laslett (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Lutz, Donald S., “Toward a theory of constitutional amendment”, American Political Science Review 88 (2) (1994), p. 356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944709
Madison, James, “The Federalist No. XLIII”, en Alexander Hamilton, John Jay y James Madison, Federalist, on the New Constitution, New York, B. Warner, 1817.
Montesquieu, El espíritu de las leyes, Libro XI, en https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/montesquieu-complete-works-vol-1-the-spirit-of-laws, fecha de consulta: 2 de agosto de 2019.
Nolan, Aoife, “Ireland: The separation of powers doctrine vs. socio-economic rights”, en Malcolm Langford (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Pillay, Anashri, “Economic and social rights adjudication: Developing principles of judicial restraint in South African and the United Kingdom”, Public Law 3, (2013).
Roznai, Yaniv, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. The Limits of Amendment Powers, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
Schlafty, Phyllis M., The Supremacist: The Tyranny of Judges and Hot to Stop it, Dallas, Spence, 2004.
Steinberg, Carol, “Can reasonableness protect the poor? A review of South Africa’s socio-economic rights jurisprudence”, South African Law Journal 123 (2006), en https://journals.co.za/content/ju_salj/123/2/EJC53695
Tushnet, Mark, Weak Courts Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2009, pp. x-xi.
Versteeg, Mila y Emily Zackin, “Constitutions unentrenched: Towards an alternative theory of constitutional design”, American Political Science Review 110 (2016), p. 657.
Waldron, Jeremy, “The core of the case against judicial review”, The Yale Law Journal 115 (2006), en https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol115/iss6/3/
Waluchow, Wil, “Constitutionalism”, en Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018, en https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/constitutionalism/, fecha de consulta: 25 de enero de 2019.
Wenzel, James P., Shaun Bowler y David J. Lanoue, “Legislating from the state bench: A comparative analysis of judicial activism”, American Politics Quarterly 25 (1997), pp. 363-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9702500306
Young, Katharine, “A typology of economic and social rights adjudication: Exploring the catalytic function of judicial review”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (3) (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq029
Young, Katharine, Constituting Economic and Social Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta revista y sus artículos se publican bajo la licencia CreativeCommons CC BY 4.0 DEED Atribución 4.0 Internacional, usted es libre de: Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. La licencia no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
