Neoconstitutionalism and Practical Reasonableness (Theoretical Framework for a Proposed Master in Constitutional Law)

Abstract

This article presents the transformations experienced by Colombian law due to the so-called neoconstitutionalism, from a perspective that seeks to draw both its positive and problematic aspects. In essence they are four: first, an order of values projected on the entire legal system and that, somehow, “materialize” social life and the objective requirements of human dignity. Second, an innovative legal and institutional strength of the Constitution, with direct application of its rules. Third, a revitalization of juridical interpretation, which requires further rational coordinates. Finally, the emergence of new problems related with the legitimacy of the arguments of constitutional decisions. Within this context, it attempts to show the essential guidelines to support a proposal for a graduate academic education in Constitutional Law, highlighting the importance of organizing such proposal from the coordinates of practical reasoning and interpretation. In this sense, the text is part of the theoretical justification for a Master in Constitutional Law, vis a vis the legal and political situation in Colombia.