The moral irrelevance’s paradox of government and Law. An approach to Carlos Nino’s thought
Keywords:
Human rights, irrelevant argument, Law and Moral, deliberative democracy, government, politics and moral.Abstract
Some authors have maintained that if law and moral were connected, then law will be irrelevant as Moral will be enought to regulate social life. This paper will examine this objection against the “conection thesis”. In other words, this paper will study posible answers to the question regarding the practical difference that law provides to Moral. As starting point, It will be taken some written texts of the Argentine philosopher Carlos Nino that deal with this topic.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.