The Deconstruction of Personhood and the Rights-holder/Rights-object Binomial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2023.32.1.1Keywords:
Subject, deconstruction, non-human persons, posthumansAbstract
A long-lasting tradition of Western thinking has considered that human nature and the individual are non-historical and self-identical; both represent a fixed and immutable reality, either because they are an expression of transcendence (scholastics) or because they are an end on their own (enlightened). This notion of the human person leads to a concept of dignity that is equally self-identical and expressed in the intrinsic value of a reality whose endpoints are perfectly delineated in a dialectical binary opposition concerning non-personal realities. As a counterpart, the thesis that declares a metaphysical closure denounces the end of that trend, as the former would lay the basis to reshape the personality, replacing the logic of the opposites with the logic of supplement, whose properly deconstructive element lies in the denial of the possibility of foundation. This implies a double destructuring movement: (a) to affirm that some nonhuman reality of the corporeal world is also personal, and (b) to deny that human reality is always and, in any case, personal. This paper aims to explain how this reconfiguration of the notions of “person” and “thing” occurs in current thinking.
Downloads
References
Agar, Nicholas, Truly Human Enhancement. A Philosophical Defense of Limits, London, MIT Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026635.001.0001
Anomaly, Jonathan, Creating Future People. The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement, New York, Routledge, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014805
Aquinas, Saint Thomas, Sum Theol. Madrid, Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 2014 en https://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/1225-1274,_Thomas_Aquinas,_Summa_Theologiae_%5B1%5D,_EN.pdf
Aquinas, Saint Thomas, Suma contra Gentiles (Mercedes Bergadá, trad), Club de Lectores, Buenos Aires, 1951.
Aquinas, Saint Thomas, De Veritate, https://isidore.co/aquinas/QDdeVer10.htm
Aristotle, Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, 1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00263632
Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart. London: The Athlone Press, 1970.
Binder, Julius Das Problem das Juristischen Persönlichkeit, Leipzig, A. Deichert, 1907. Available at: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/binder/ProblemJuristischenPersonlichkeit.pdf
Bobbio, Norberto, El problema del positivismo jurídico, México, Fontamara, 1995.
Boecio: Liber de persona et duabus naturis contre Eutychem et Nestorius. Available at: http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/02m/0480-0524,_Boethius._Severinus,_Liber_De_Persona_Et_Duabus_Naturis_Contra_Eutychen_Et_Nestorium,_MLT.pdf
Bostrom, Nick, “A History of Transhumanist Thought,” in Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14 (April 2005), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_26
Braidotti, Rossi, Lo posthumano. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2013.
Chaberek, Michael, Catholicism & Evolution. A History from Darwin to Pope Francis. Kettering, OH, Angelico Press, 2015.
Cobo, S., “La imagen de Dios en el hombre en la teología de Henri de Lubac,” in Teología y Vida, vol. 59 n. 2 (2018), pp. 171-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0049-34492018000200171
Culleton, Alfredo “Tres aportes al concepto de persona: Boecio (substancia), Ricardo de San Víctor (existencia) y Escoto (incomunicabilidad),” in Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval, 17 (2010), pp. 59-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v17i.6145
Deleuze, Gilles, El poder. Curso sobre Foucault, vol. II (Pablo Ires y Sebastián Puentes, trad.). Buenos Aires, Editorial Cactus, 2014.
Derrida J. Dissemination, translated by Barbara Johnson, The University of Chicago Press, 1981.
Derrida, Jacques, “Posiciones,” Interview with Jean-Louis Houdebine and Guy Scarpetta, in Derrida, J., Posiciones, Valencia Pre-Textos, 1977.
Derrida, Jacques, Éperons (Les styles de Nietzsche), París, Flammarion, 1978. Spanish version: Espolones. Los estilos de Nietzsche (M. Arranz Lázaro, trad.), Valencia Pre-textos, 1981.
Derrida, Jacques, Margins of Philosophy, The Harvester Press, Chicago, 1982.
Derrida, Jacques, The Parergon (C. Owens, trad.). October 9, 3-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/778319
Derrida, Jacques, On Grammatology, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
Derrida, Jacques, The Animal that therefore I am, Fordham University Press, 2008.
Dirakis, Alexis, “Political Correctness: Implosion of Politics,” in Philosophies, 2 (2017), pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies2030018
Douglas, Thomas, “Human enhancement and supra-personal moral status,” in Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 162, no. 3 (February 2013), pp. 473-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9778-2
Ellis, Frank, Political Correctness and the Theoretical Struggle. Auckland, Maxim Institute, 2004.
Ferrajoli, Luigi, Derechos y garantías. La ley del más débil. Madrid, Trotta, 1999.
Filippi, S., “Persona y naturaleza: de Pedro Lombardo a Heidegger.” Scripta Medievalia, 2, n. 1 (2009), 51-83.
Forment, Eudaldo, “Persona y conciencia en Santo Tomás de Aquino,” in Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval, 10 (2003), pp. 275-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v10i.9268
Friedman, Jonathan, PC Worlds. Political Correctness and Rising Elites at the End of Hegemonies, Nueva York, Berghahan, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1850hb3
Gadamer, Hans Georg, Verdad y método, I. Salamanca, Sígueme, 2005, p. 567.
García-Valdecasas, M., El sujeto en Tomás de Aquino. La perspectiva clásica sobre un problema moderno, EUNSA, Pamplona, 2003.
Garrigou-Lagrange, Règinald, Las tres edades de la vida espiritual, Ediciones Palabra, Madrid, 2003.
Grassi, Ernesto, La filosofía del humanismo. Preeminencia de la palabra. Barcelona, Anthropos, 1993.
Grocio, Hugo, De iure belli ac pacis: libri tres, in quibus ius naturae et gentium, item juris publici praecipua explicantur, The Lawbook Exchange Ltd., New Jersey, 2005.
Grossi, Paolo, El novecientos jurídico. Un siglo postmoderno, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2011.
Habermas, Jürgen,. “Lecciones sobre una fundamentación de la sociología en términos de teoría del lenguaje,” en Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Complementos y estudios previos (M. Jiménez Redondo, trad.), Madrid, Cátedra, 1989.
Harrison, Ruth, Animal Machines, London, Vincent Stuart Publishers, 1964.
Heidegger, Martin, Brief über den ‘Humanismus’. In Ídem, Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit. Mit einem Brief über den ‘Humanismus. Bern: Francke, 1954.
Hervada, Javier, “Lo nuevo y lo viejo en la hipótesis ‘etiamsi daremus’ de Grocio,” in Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho, 1, (1958), pp. 352-368. Available at http://www.rehj.cl/index.php/rehj/article/viewFile/99/97
Holbrook, Daniel, “Descartes on Persons,” in The Personalist Forum, Supplement: Studies in Personalist Philosophy. Proceedings of the Conference on Persons, 8(1), 1992, 9-14.
Horta, Oscar, Un paso adelante en defensa de los animales, Madrid, Plaza y Valdés, 2017.
Husserl, Edmund, Meditaciones cartesianas, Madrid, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1985.
Husserl, Edmund, La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental, Barcelona, Editorial Crítica, 1990.
Ienca, Marcelo, “On Neurorights,” in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15 (September 2021), pp. 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258
Kahn, Charles, Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, Columbia University Press, 1950.
Kant, Immanuel, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Hamburgo: Meiner Philosophische Bibliothek, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2878-9
Kotzmann, Jane, & Seery, Cassandra, “Dignity in international human rights law: potential applicability in relation to international recognition of animal rights,” in Michigan State International Law Review, vol. 26.1 (2017), pp. 1-42.
Levinas, Emmanuel, Totalidad e infinito. Ensayo sobre la exterioridad. Salamanca, Sígueme, 1992.
Luhmann, Nicholas, Sistemas sociales: lineamientos para una Teoría General. Mexico, Alianza Editorial / Universidad Iberoamericana, 1991.
Machlup, F., The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the US. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1962.
Madrid, Raúl, “Derecho e interés. Sobre la (no) necesidad de los derechos colectivos,” en El derecho natural en la realidad social y jurídica (Eduardo Soto Kloss y Sergio Castaño, eds.), Santiago, Universidad Santo Tomás, 2005, pp. 263-276.
Masuda, Y., La sociedad informatizada como sociedad post-industrial. Madrid, Tecnos, 1984.
Mitalaité, Kristina, “Entre Persona et Natura: La notion de personne durant le Haut Moyen Âge,” in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 89(3), 2005, 459-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rspt.893.0459
Nimmer, R. y Krauthaus, A., “Information as a Commodity: New Imperatives of Comercial Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 55, n. 3 (1992), 103-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1191865
San Víctor, Ricardo de, De Trinitate. French version by G. Salet, Richard de Saint-Victor, La Trinité (Sources Chrétiennes, 63), Du Cerf, Paris 1959.
Scoto, D., Ordinatio, en Opera Omnia (edición crítica). Studio et cura Commissionis Socotisticae ad fidem, Polyglottis Vaticanis, Ciudad del Vaticano, 1950.
Pietrzykowski, Tomasz, “Towards modest naturalization of personhood in law,” in Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law (2017), 59-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.3863
Regan, Tom, The Case for Animal Rights, The University of California Press, Berkeley, 1983.
Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation, New York, Ecco (Harper & Collins), 2002.
Souza Santos, Boaventura de, Pela mao de Alice. O Social e o Político na Pos- Modernidade. Coimbra, Almedina, 2013.
Valdés, Nicolás, “El camino narrativo de Boccaccio,” en Philologia Hispalensis, 7 (1992), 285-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.1992.v07.i01.23
Varela, F. J., Autopoiesis and a Biology of intentionality. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis & Perception. Proceedings of a workshop held in Dublin City University, August 25th & 26th 1992 (pp. 1-14). Dublin: School of Electronic Engineering Technical Report, 1994.
Wellmer, Albrecht, “La dialéctica de modernidad y postmodernidad,” in J. Picó (Ed.), Modernidad y Postmodernidad, Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1988, 103-140.
Wolfe, Cary, What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Díkaion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
