Argumentation, principles and reasonableness between irrationality and rationality
Keywords:
Legal arguments, principles, rules, Criminal Law, human rights, positivism, basic human goods.Abstract
The author's intention in this paper is to provide a summary account of the complex ambiguities, paradoxes and difficulties confronting the legal practitioner in today's world; that is, in the context provided by the constitutional state, and the pivotal points of the various alternatives that have been offered as theoretical-practical solutions. An attempt to resolve indecisiveness by resorting to constitutional principles opens up a range of problems. How do we explain the relationship between legal principles and rules? The answers to this question provided by irrationalism, rationalism and those who take the path of reasonableness are presented and compared.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2014-11-18
How to Cite
Cianciardo, J. (2014). Argumentation, principles and reasonableness between irrationality and rationality. Díkaion, 23(1), 11–36. Retrieved from https://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/3649
Issue
Section
Articles
License
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
