Fallacies and Truths in the Current Fundamental Rights Justification

Authors

  • Daniel Alejandro Herrera Author Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Católica de Buenos Aires

Keywords:

Human rights, essentials rights, fallacy, true, positivistic reason, proceduralist reason, practical reason, metaphysics, anthropology.

Abstract

In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the exposure of the different foundations, they will be classified in three lines: 1) positivistic reason; 2) proceduralist reason; 3) practical reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniel Alejandro Herrera, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Católica de Buenos Aires

Doctor en Ciencias Jurídicas. Profesor titular de Filosofía del Derecho de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Downloads

Published

2011-02-25

How to Cite

Herrera, D. A. (2011). Fallacies and Truths in the Current Fundamental Rights Justification. Díkaion, 19(2). Retrieved from https://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2010): Derecho natural e interpretación jurídica

Section

Articles

License

1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access

 

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.