Spheres of Equality and Distributive Justice

Nikolaos Nikolakakis

doi:10.5294/dika.2025.34.1.1

Authors

Nikolaos Nikolakakis Author British University in Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1134-416X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2025.34.1.1

Keywords:

Equality, Walzer, distributive justice, egalitarianism, social goods

Abstract

Among political and legal theories, there is widespread agreement on equality as a normative principle. The present paper’s main argument is constructed as a set, rather than as a system, of isolated positions within the framework of a view of the concepts of justice and equality. The epistemological rejection of foundationalism is accompanied by the methodological priority of politics over philosophy. The central positions derive from the adherence to a pluralistic galaxy of incommensurable values, which function as concurrent variables. The argumentation this paper brings forward is based predominantly on Walzer’s approach and views the principles of justice as pluralistic in form. As such, their distribution depends on different reasons, follows different procedures, and involves multiple agents. The most important political question is, thus, whether we should design and control the distribution of these social goods or allow the distribution to be free and, as such, random. In the first case, the next question is which form of equality suits which good; this decision can lead to results more different from each other than the same adherence or non-adherence to the principle of equality. The paper concludes with an attempt to connect specific, socially important goods to types of distributive justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARISTOTLE, Ηθικά Νικομάχεια [Nicomachean Ethics], Athens, Kaktos, 1993.

ARISTOTLE, Πολιτικά [Politics], Athens, Kaktos, 1993.

BUTLER, Judith, “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of Postmodernism,” in Judith BUTLER and Joan W. SCOTT (eds.), Feminists theorise the Political, New York/London, Routledge, 1992.

COHEN, Gerald Allan, “On the currency of egalitarian justice,” Ethics 99 (4), 1989, pp. 906-944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/293126.

DWORKIN, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, London, Duckworth, 1977.

FULLINWIDER, Robert K., The reverse discrimination controversy: A moral and legal analysis. Totowa, New Jersey, Rowman & Allanheld, 1980.

HORWITZ, Robert, “John Dewey,” in Leo STRAUSS and Joseph CROPSEY (eds.), History of Political Philosophy, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1963.

HUME, David, “Justice and Equality,” in Louis P. POJMAN and Robert WESTMORELAND (eds.), Equality: Selected Readings, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.

KYMLICKA, Will, Contemporary Political Philosophy, New York, Oxford University Press, 1990.

LASLETT, Peter, ‘Introduction,’ in Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.

LOCKE, John, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268.

MILLER, David, Principles of social justice, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 1999.

NAGEL, Theodor, Equality and Partiality, New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1991.

NOZICK, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York City, Basic Books, 1974.

OKUN, Arthur M., Equality and Partiality, New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1975.

OPPENHEIM, Felix E., “Egalitarianism as a Descriptive Concept,” American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1970).

RAWLS, John, A Theory of Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1971.

ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques, “The Discourse on the Origins of Inequality,” in Louis P. POJMAN and Robert WESTMORELAND (eds.), Equality: Selected Readings, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.

SCHEFFLER, Samuel, “What is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31, 1 (2003), pp. 5-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00005.x.

SEERY, John E., “Castles in the Air. An Essay on Political Foundations,” Political Theory 27, 4 (1999), pp. 460-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591799027004003.

SEN, Amartya, Inequality re-examined, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 1992.

VON LEYDEN, Wolfgang, “On justifying Inequality,” Political Studies 11, 1 (1963), pp. 56-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1963.tb01048.x.

WALZER, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, Oxford, Blackwell, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj75nh.

WALZER, Michael, Thick and Thin, Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340593.

WESTEN, Peter, “The empty idea of equality,” Harvard Law Review 95, 3 (1982), pp. 537-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340593.

WOLFF, Jonathan, An Introduction to Political Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996.