The Right to Conscientious Objection: Criteria for Interpretation

Authors

  • María Marta Didier Author Universidad Católica de Santa Fe Universidad Católica Argentina (Sede Paraná)

Keywords:

Conscientious objection, freedom of religion and conscience, reasonableness, proportionality, equality, discrimination, practical reasonableness.

Abstract

The study argues that the principle of reasonableness is possibly one way to determine when conscientious objection constitutes the regular exercise of a right based on legal philosophy, the theory of fundamental rights and jurisprudential practice. A constitutionality test applicable to the regulations on the right to conscientious objection in the Argentine legal system is proposed by way of conclusion.

DOI: 10.5294/dika.2015.24.2.3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Marta Didier, Universidad Católica de Santa Fe Universidad Católica Argentina (Sede Paraná)

Doctora en Derecho por la Universidad Austral. Profesora de Filosofía del Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Santa Fe y de la Universidad Católica Argentina (Sede Paraná).

Downloads

Published

2016-06-10

How to Cite

Didier, M. M. (2016). The Right to Conscientious Objection: Criteria for Interpretation. Díkaion, 24(2), 253–281. Retrieved from https://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/5194

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access

 

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.