Curtoprazismo corporativo como expressão do modelo da primazia dos acionistas e a necessidade de repensá-lo: Estados Unidos e Colômbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2021.30.2.6Palavras-chave:
Visão de curto prazo, problemas de agência, modelo da primazia do acionista, modelo das partes interessadas, modelo de stakeholdersResumo
O curtoprazismo corporativo é uma expressão do modelo da primazia dos accionistas, que será abordada a partir de sua aplicação nos Estados Unidos e na Colômbia. O aumento dos ganhos para os acionistas no curto prazo pode, segundo o caso, gerar externalidades negativas nos demais stakeholders e colocar em risco o futuro da empresa e os investimentos dos próprios acionistas no longo prazo. Portanto, é pertinente e necessário repensar esse modelo para adotar o modelo de stakeholders e atribuir aos administradores um papel mediador entre os diferentes stakeholders. Além disso, os acionistas também devem assumir a responsabilidade e é hora de começar a discutir a atribuição de deveres expressos para eles, o que vai mais além da boa-fé e da proibição de abuso de direitos, como é o caso dos administradores.
Downloads
Referências
Alexander, Frederick, “Fiduciary duties for conventional corporations enforcing shareholder primacy”, en Benefit Corporation Law and Governance: Pursuing Profit with Purpose, Oakland, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2018.
Armour, John, Luca Enriques, Henry Hansmann y Reinier Kraakman, “The basic governance structure: The interests of shareholders as a class”, en European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI), Law Working Paper (337) (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901416
Aspen Institute Business & Society Program, “Overcoming short-termism: A call for a more responsible approach to investment and business management”, 16 de septiembre de 2009, en https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/overcoming-short-termism-call-more-responsible-approach-investment-business-management/, fecha de consulta: 12 de septiembre de 2020.
Bainbridge, Stephen, “In defense of the shareholder wealth maximization norm: A reply to professor Green”, en Washington & Lee Law Review 50 (4) (1993), pp. 1423-1447.
Beale, Frederick y Mario Fernando, “Short-termism and genuineness in environmental initiatives: A comparative case study of two oil companies”, en European Management Journal 27 (1) (2009), pp. 26-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.002
Bebchuk, Lucian, “The case for increasing shareholder power”, en Harvard Law Review 118 (3) (2005), pp. 833-914.
Berle, Adolf y Gardiner Means, The Modern Corporation & Private Property, 2 ed., New York, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 1932.
Blair, Margaret y Lynn Stout, “A team production theory of corporate law”, en Virginia Law Review 85 (2) (1999), pp. 247-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1073662
Bower, Joseph y Lynn Paine, “The error at the heart of corporate leadership”, en Harvard Business Review, en https://hbr.org/2017/05/managing-for-the-long-term, fecha de consulta: 20 de septiembre de 2020.
Bratton, William, “Enron and the dark side of shareholder value”, en Tulane Law Review 76 (2002), pp. 1275-1361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.301475
Bushee, Brian, “The influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investments Behavior”, en The Accounting Review 73 (1998), pp. 305-306.
Business Roundtable, “Business Roundtable redefines the purpose of a corporation to promote ‘an economy that serves all americans’”, 19 de agosto de 2019, en https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans, fecha de consulta: 12 de septiembre de 2020.
Citron Research, “Valeant: Could this be the Pharmaceutical Enron?”, 21 de octubre de 2015, en https://citronresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Valeant-Philador-and-RandO-final-a.pdf, fecha de consulta: 20 de septiembre de 2020.
Citron Research, “Why a congressional subpoena to Valeant about price gouging on drugs should be granted”, 28 de septiembre de 2015, en https://citronresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/valeant-part-1-final.pdf, fecha de consulta: 20 de septiembre de 2020.
Coffee, John, “The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications”, en Northwestern University Law Review 93 (3) (1999), p. 641.
Congreso de la República de Colombia, Ley 1258 de 2008.
Congreso de la República de Colombia, Ley 222 de 1995.
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia C-815 de 2001.
Dent, George, “The essential unity of shareholders and the myth of investor short-termism”, en Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 35 (1) (2010), pp. 126-128.
Diario La Vanguardia, “Enron: el mayor escándalo financiero de la historia, tan grande como olvidado”, 2 de diciembre de 2016, en https://www.lavanguardia.com/economia/20161202/412319658496/enron-quiebra-escandalo.html, fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021.
Dodge c. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W., 668, 1919.
Duruigbo, Emeka, “Tackling shareholder short-termism and managerial myopia”, en Kentucky Law Journal 100 (3) (2011-2012), pp. 531-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1802840
Dyck, Alexander y Luigi Zingales, “Private benefits of control: An international comparison”, en The Journal of Finance 59 (2) (2004), pp. 537-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00642.x
eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. c. Newmark, 16 A.3d 1 (Del. Ch. 2010).
Fisch, Jill, “Measuring efficiency in corporate law: The role of shareholder primacy”, en Journal of Corporation Law 31 (3) (2006). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.878391
Friedman, Milton, “A Friedman doctrine—The Social Responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, 13 de septiembre de 1970, en https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html, fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021
George, Bill, “Another view: Can biotech survive icahn”, 3 de junio de 2010, en https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/another-view-can-biotech-survive-icahn/, fecha de consulta: 13 de septiembre de 2020.
Gibney, Alex y Brian McGinn, “Dirty Money: Short selling and pharmaceuticals”, 2018, en www.netflix.com, fecha de consulta: 12 de septiembre de 2020.
Gibney, Alex, “Enron: The smartest guys in the room”, en Amazon Prime Video, 2005, en www.primevideo.com, fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021.
Hansmann, Henry y Reinier Kraakman, “The end of history for corporate law”, en Georgetown Law Journal 89 (2) (2001), pp. 439-468.
Hazen, Thomas, “The short-term/long-term dichotomy and investment theory: Implications for securities market regulation and for corporate law”, en North Carolina Law Review 70 (1) (1991), pp. 137-207.
Henderson, Todd, “Everything old is new again: Lessons from Dodge v. Ford Motor Company”, en John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper (373) (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1070284
Hertig, Gerard, Hideki Kanda y John Armour, “Transactions with Creditors”, en AA.VV., The Anatomy of Corporate Law. A Comparative and Functional Approach, 3 ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 109-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.003.0005
Hunter c. Robert, Throp & Co., 83 Mich 63, 71, 47 N. W. 131.
Juzgado Noveno de Pequeñas Causas y Competencia Múltiple de Bogotá, Sentencia de tutela del 04 de agosto de 2020, rad. 2020-00083.
Kraakman, Henry, Reinier Hansman y John Armour, “Agency problems and legal strategies”, en AA. VV., The Anatomy of Corporate Law A Comparative and Functional Approach, 3 ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio López de Silanes y Andrei Shleifer, “Corporate ownership around the world”, en The Journal of Finance 54 (2) (1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Lahart, Justin, “Wrong way? Street signs point to speed”, en The Wall Street Journal, 26 de febrero de 2007, en https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB117244638061618757, fecha de consulta: 13 de septiembre de 2020.
Lee, Louise, “It’s time to value stakeholders over shareholders”, en Stanford Business, 4 de mayo de 2018, en https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/its-time-value-stakeholders-over-shareholders, fecha de consulta: 20 de septiembre de 2020.
Martínez-Echevarría, Alfonso, “The nature of shareholding and regulating shareholders’ duties”, en H. Birkmose (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties, European Company Law Series vol. 12, Países Bajos, Kluwer Law International BV, 2017.
Mitchell, Lawrence, “A critical look at corporate governance”, en Vanderbilt Law Review 45 (5) (1992), pp. 1263-1318.
OCDE, “White Paper” sobre Gobierno Corporativo en América Latina, OCDE, 2004.
O’Connor, Marleen, “Organized labor as shareholder activist: Building coalitions to promote worker capitalism”, en University of Richmond Law Review 31 (5) (1997), pp. 1345-1398.
Posner, Richard, El análisis económico del derecho, 7 ed., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2007.
Reyes Villamizar, Francisco, Análisis económico del derecho de sociedades, 2 ed., Bogotá, Legis, 2013.
Reyes Villamizar, Francisco, Derecho Societario, 2 ed., Bogotá, Temis, 2011.
Schacht, Kurt, “Breaking the short-term cycle”, en Fourth Annual Director´s Institute on Corporate Governance (2006), pp. 583-591.
Simons c. Cogan, 549 A.2d 300, 303 (Del. 1988).
Stout, Lynn, “The toxic side effects of shareholder primacy”, en University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161 (7) (2013), pp. 2003-2023.
Strand, Therese, “An economic view on shareholder duties in corporate governance”, en H. Birkmose (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties, European Company Law Series vol. 12, Países Bajos, Kluwer Law International BV, 2017.
Strine, Leo, “The dangers of denial: The need for a clear-eyed understanding of the power and accountability structure established by the Delaware general corporation law”, en Wake Forest Law Review 50 (2015).
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Auto 801-16441 del 3 de octubre de 2013, RCN Televisión S.A. contra Media Consulting Group S.A.S., rad. 2013-801-126.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Oficio 220-055866 del 23 de noviembre de 2007.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Oficio 220-14442 del 30 de abril de 1998, rad. 261.514.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Sentencia 800-119 del 17 de septiembre de 2015, Martha Cecilia López contra Comercializadora G.L. S.A.S., Luis Enrique Gil Builes y Distribuidora del Kamino S.A.S., rad. 2014-801-136.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Sentencia 800-122 del 11 de diciembre de 2017, Panavías Ingeniería & Construcciones S.A. en reorganización contra Agro Repuestos S.A.S. en liquidación y otros, rad. 2015-01-419998.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Sentencia 800-50 del 8 de mayo de 2015, Alienergy S.A. contra Álvaro José Márquez y Gestión Orgánica GEO S.A.S., rad. 2013-801-157.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, Sentencia 800-54 del 15 de mayo de 2015, Jovalco S.A.S. contra Construcciones Orbi S.A., rad. 2014-801-166.
Superintendencia de Sociedades, “Indicadores de gobierno corporativo en empresas de capital cerrado año 2018”, 15 de diciembre de 2019, en https://www.supersociedades.gov.co/Noticias/Paginas/2019/Supersociedades-presenta-informe-sobre-el-Gobierno-Corporativo-en-las-empresas-colombianas.aspx, fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021.
The Guardian, “The Volkswagen emissions scandal explained”, 23 de septiembre de 2015, en https://www.theguardian.com/business/ng-interactive/2015/sep/23/volkswagen-emissions-scandal-explained-diesel-cars, fecha de consulta: de 5 de junio de 2021.
U.S. Security and Exchange Comission, “SEC Registration: Bausch Health Companies Inc.”, 04 de noviembre de 2019, en https://sec.report/CIK/0000885590, fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021.
Welsh, Michelle, Peta Spender, Irene Lynch Fannon y Kath Hall, “The end of the ‘End of History for Corporate Law’?”, en Australian Journal of Corporate Law 29 (2014), pp. 147-168.
World Economic Forum, “¿Qué tipo de capitalismo queremos?”, 2 de diciembre de 2019, en https://es.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/que-tipo-de-capitalismo-queremos/, fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021.
World Economic Forum, “Manifiesto de Davos 2020: el propósito universal de las empresas en la Cuarta Revolución Industrial”, 2 de diciembre de 2019, en https://es.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/manifiesto-de-davos-2020-el-proposito-universal-de-las-empresas-en-la-cuarta-revolucion-industrial/ fecha de consulta: 5 de junio de 2021.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Díkaion
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Esta revista e os seus artigos estão publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Você tem o direito de compartilhar, copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Para que isto ocorra: você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas; você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais; e, se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
